There's no "obviously". Do you have earlier nude photos showing her with smaller breasts? That's about the only way it rises to the level of "obvious". I see no "obvious" scars; in some photos and video I've seen what might be scarring under an areola, but it's not "obvious" and if true it was done much better than average. I agree it's possible or even likely but not "obvious" that her breasts are modified. Go watch her Love Suite video and then tell me again how it's "obvious".
I explained very clearly why it's not obvious. Size and shape is not proof. You offered no compelling reason why her breasts must be augmented; no one has, and yet the profile describes them as such. "To add something more" is exactly what is necessary here.
There's also a difference between annoyance and anger. Your reply edges me closer to the latter.
Comments
Now she's new at femjoy, going as "Emily A".
She is also known as Emily Addison. (ddg, twistys)
Agency:
http://www.modelmayhem.com/emilyaddison
Penthouse Pet of the Month for September 2011
she is "Emily" @ youngbusty.com
There is no way the girl in the X-Art link is Emily Addison. For one, Emily does not do b/g...
You're absolutely right x-art Addison is Mia Manarote
(:R
Elle est Emily Addison : Bikini Riot
page de la modele: http://www.bikiniriot.com/models/emily-addison.php
DIGITALDESIRE2: Emily Addison (http://www.digitaldesire.com/members/models/2505/emily_addison)
BRAZZERS: Emily Addison (http://www.brazzers.com/profile/view/id/1767/emily-addison/)
Penthouse Pets: Emily Addison (http://penthouse-pets.net/pet/emily_addison.html)
INDEXXX: http://www.indexxx.com/models/46074/emily-addison/
TWISTYS: treat of the month for November 2010 (http://girls.twistys.com/preview/totm/11-2010/p01/)
http://peachyforum.com/t/emily-addison-325849.aspx
Her boobs are fake obviously. :b DD plus referring to twistys.
http://www.freeones.com/html/e_links/Emily_Addison/
There's no "obviously". Do you have earlier nude photos showing her with smaller breasts? That's about the only way it rises to the level of "obvious". I see no "obvious" scars; in some photos and video I've seen what might be scarring under an areola, but it's not "obvious" and if true it was done much better than average. I agree it's possible or even likely but not "obvious" that her breasts are modified. Go watch her Love Suite video and then tell me again how it's "obvious".
I really don´t understand your anger. What it´s obvious it´s simply obvious (and sad) and to add something more is not necessary.
I explained very clearly why it's not obvious. Size and shape is not proof. You offered no compelling reason why her breasts must be augmented; no one has, and yet the profile describes them as such. "To add something more" is exactly what is necessary here.
There's also a difference between annoyance and anger. Your reply edges me closer to the latter.
http://boobpedia.com/boobs/Emily_Addison