Not yet a member?
Lost your password?
Reset it here
Image Courtesy of AVEROTICA
Submitted Links (Outside of theNUDE control!):
No Links - unless they illustrate your comment. No REAL names, unless the name is in common use. No links to copyrighted material. No "I Love U's". No gynaecological comments. No uncomplimentary comments. No third party links - they're welcome but use the "Web Link" button on the gallery tab. No links to "Escort" pages - they're false.
Yes to page typos, errors and corrections. Yes to missing bits of info. Yes to missing covers. Yes to most things that add to the model page - including how gorgeous you think they are!
Sometimes I don't do the updates immediately - please be patient. Sometimes I miss them. Sometimes you have to tell me more than once. Sometimes...I'm not here! :) (:R
much nicer as blonde IMO would love to see her blonde again. first sets at met art are work of art. she must be dating a hairy lover weirdo :PPP
Did some more research and Eva J from club seventeen is actually Monika Thu.
I'm pretty sure that the clubseventeen model Eva J is not her the breasts are different the belly button doesn't match the eye color is different since one has brown eyes and the other one more greenish brown eyes and the face isn't that similar either and on top of all that none of the moles match either.
i agree she's definitely the same model
much nicer as blonde. in fact i think clemens' sets are my met-art favs
Now at femjoy as Adel P. :)
It's NOT two different models. The moles were removed in photoshop, like Met-Art does in many things. Anyone who knows anything about photography knows this. I already confirmed the moles by using her AVErotica sets side by side with her old and new Met-Art sets. Eva J is Sienne. Same girl. All they did was dye her hair (or let her hair be natural actually) and not edit out the moles in editing. Anyone who can't see that should stay out of photography and art.
I don't know that anybody disagrees with you. As you say, it is totally obvious that Sienne is Renata @ AV. What has been suggested (see comment by Ricksim below) is that the two sets by Antonio Clemens might be a different model, but I believe I've disproved that suggestion.
Met-art are playing the rename game again. Having originally called her Eva J, they are now reintroducing her as Sienne. :s
If I understand Ricksim right, we might have two models here. Model1 would be the Eva J of the two MA sets by Antonio Clemens. Model2 would be Ron Offlin's Eva J aka Maya (SB) aka Irma (P4E) aka Renata (AV). I don't suppose there's any doubt about the latter all being one and the same. The mole test is unambiguous.
A mole test between Model1 and Model2 doesn't work because Model1 is 100% mole-free. Such utter perfection does not occur in nature. Only photoshop can create it. As to the teeth, she seems to have done something to put them right because she can be seen wearing dental braces in some of the AV sets.
If neither moles nor teeth stand up to scrutiny, is there some other test that might elucidate the matter? I've done the "areolae test", comparing the small "goose bumps" that surround the nipples. They tend to form a pattern that is unique to each woman and remains stable over time. It sounds simpler than it actually is. In reality, you don't often get enough materiel with the right focus and lighting and level of detail for a reliable test. But in this case, I believe we have a match.
Summarising, do we believe that Model1 and Model2 are one and the same? I believe I have invalidated the two arguments against (moles, teeth) and I can see an argument for.
I think there are two different models here. Pretty4ever and METArt Ilakis model are the same girl but I think she is not the same as the other sets. METArt says they are the same girl but I don't believe them because:
- Moles don't match (mole above right nipple and in right armpit in P4E/Ilakis is missing in the others)
- P4E/Ilakis model has a small smile but the other sets have a girl with a big smile showing off her crooked teeth
What does anyone else think?
At first sight, the Adelia B connection seemed very convincing. But it doesn't stand up to closer scrutiny. Mole test negative. Different pussy, different breast size & shape...
The girl on the cover
METART, "Ilakis", Eva J
is similar to
EROTICBEAUTY, "Lismias", Adelia B (same shooting location)
METART, "Presenting Adelia", Adelia B
I really can't say for sure - I think you could be right but photoshop does make things difficult! I need a second opinion - anyone? (:R